Foreword
Yes, cables again! Once an audiophile has heard remarkable differences between
audio cables, he/she will very likely continue the “cable ballet”.
Changing cabling is a good and widely accepted way to make fine adjustments
to the personality of the sound, which it will do compellingly in more or less
all cases. Personally, I have tested huge amount of cables from almost every
remarkable vendor and I believe I have found the most suitable ones for my set-up
and for my taste.
In Finland there has been a serious gap amongst the imported audio cables but
now this hole has been plugged with Kimber Kables. Hifihuone decided to begin
importing Kimber Kables last year and actualized their decision this year. I
think it was strategically well done, because the knowledge of cable effects
is increasing in Finland.
What made me write again about cables? Well, an interesting phenomenon happened
in my audio enthusiasm last summer. I was quite tired and frustrated by my reviewing
and publishing work but after receiving the set of Kimber’s cables my
interest rose again. The first listening sessions even furthered the positive
feeling. So, at least sometimes, testing is rewarding and not just hard work.
Besides, it would have been a shame to leave such a brand as Kimber without
special attention.
Background
RI shall not write a historical document of Kimber Kables of which I’m
not even capable. Anyway it is good to know that Kimber Kables was founded in
1979 when Ray Kimber also introduced the first product, the 4PR loudspeaker
cable. Decades passed and this year Kimber Kables celebrated the 30th anniversary
of their business, actually just during my tests. My belated congratulations!
The story of Kimber Kables has been a success which wouldn’t have happened
without good products. Kimber have found their own niche in the market and now
for years they have been amongst the most respected cable producers. Today Kimber
Kables' product selection covers all kinds of audio/video cables, power cords
and even special products like connectors and capacitors.
Kimber Kables has a very simple philosophy which is to develop and manufacture
cables that offer the highest correlation of performance and price. This may
sound common but is actually far from easy to actualize. If this aim is achieved
the results will do great business because customers love this kind of thinking
as well. How well this philosophy works practically will be clarified only by
cable tests and comparisons.
Kimber or Kimber
Select
Besides the quality issues Kimber Kables have made their reputation by manufacturing
a quite affordable series of cables, like the 8TC speaker cable. They have had
excellent reviews and a huge amount of enthusiasts still hold with them. Anyway
Kimber Kables has continued their product development and manufacturing even
to higher levels which have finally led to introducing their Select series.
This series is based on the deepest research of the company with special emphasis
on materials, architecture, geometry and precision. Kimber has utilized their
engineering process OSCaR (Objective Subjective Correlation and Results), in
which the research of signal propagation has been given a special status, for
the Select series as well. Nowadays Kimber advertises their Select products
being evidence of their continuing quest to manufacture the finest cable products.
The focus has clearly been in delivering goodies for the most demanding audiophiles.
Testing Background
During testing I listened to music from main brands. My all time favourite test
CDs were frequently used once again: George Duke: After Hours (WB 9362-47073-2),
Diana Krall: Love Scenes (IMP 12342), Pink Floyd: The Wall Live (EMI 5240752),
Respighi: Belkis, Queen of Sheba suite (RR-95CD) and Dvorak: Cello Concerto
(HMC 901867).
Three Select series cables were tested and all of them had a great look, fit
and finish. They all were also directional. As a reference I used my Transparent
Reference MM (MMI tech) series of cables in my home set-up and in certain cases
also in my friend’s set-up. Our electronics was quite similar (Audio Aero
CD-players and Audionet AMP II maxes) but the speakers were different. My friend
has impressive Burmester B-100 and I have my extremely revealing Wilson Watt/Puppy
7.
One thing which nailed my attention regularly during my test period was the
build quality of the cables. It was just flawless and inspired confidence even
in the case of the cheapest cable. This kind of testing includes always a lot
of connecting and disconnecting procedures, and if there are problems and/or
incompatibility they will be rapidly noticed and booked. None was found.
The presented prices are valid only in Finland.
1. Kimber Select KS-3035 speaker cable.
Besides the advantages of traditional Kimber Select technology the KS-3035 includes
both hyper pure copper and silver connectors in a symmetric 2:1 relationship.
The silver spade terminals were excellent WBTs. Several other connector types
are optional for reaching compatibility with a wide variety of speaker terminals.
The use of the cable was easy and gave me very confident feelings. The list
price for KS-3035 (length 2.1 m) is 5.700 euros.
KS-3035 Speaker Cables
2.
Kimber Select KS-1016 RCA interconnects.
KS-1016 was the least expensive cable of the three. Still its finish was equal
to the more expensive ones. Hyper pure and molecularly optimized copper is also
used in this cable, as well as maximized electron transfer, electrostatic and
electromagnetic relationships. As a comparison to the KS-1011 model the KS-1016
has increased conductor mass which helps to deliver more current. Despite that
the cables were extremely light weight. Although the included WBT-terminals
were good I personally would have liked them to be even more robust. Fortunately
Kimber has several connector options which may give more confidence. KS-1016
costs 920 euros (length 0.75 m).
KS-1016 Interconnects
3.
Kimber Select KS-1136 XLR interconnects.
KS-1136 balanced interconnects are Kimber’s Select series top of the line
models. They use Black Pearl silver conductors, dual concentric grounding format
and sophisticated constrained matrix construction. Additionally the KS-1136
has increased conductor mass, when compared to the KS-1130 model, matches also
ESD yarn and features studio grade XLR connectors. During the test the use of
these connectors was just a pleasure. KS-1136 costs 2.700 euros (length 0.75
m).
KS-1136 Interconnects
KS-3035 against Reference MM
This comparison was very interesting and that is why I had to write so much
text about this issue. Although both cables had a quite easily recognizable
personality it was sometimes a bit hard to evaluate which one was nearer to
the truth. When the KS-3035 was connected for use an enjoyable richness and
honourable coherence of sound were the main features which jumped to my ears.
Tone colours and timbres had very natural definition and caused real pressure
for my Transparent Reference MM which built up a bit different kind of sonic
world. Also the KS-3035 delivered very open sound with full dynamic abilities
and bandwidth extensions. My Transparent’s sound seemed to be slightly
cool when compared to the Kimber. Was it more realistic or was it lacking on
tone colours?
Finally after weeks of listening, splitting hairs and thinking carefully about
the issue I was going to lean to the Transparent’s side, just because
of the following additional notifications. My Transparent was ahead in clarity
(for example in transparency and focusing), timing and delivering micro information.
It also delivered better depth in soundstaging, defining a more spectacular
layer by layer performance. So, it would be conflicting to think that previously
mentioned results would be possible if KS-3035 was more right when connected
into my system. Anyway, especially if I had not had my Transparent Reference
MM as a reference, the KS-3035 could have charmed me easily and totally. Its
ability to deliver very clean audio was more than obvious.
KS-3035’s performance and features frequently resembled Siltech Escay
Creek and Tara Labs the Two speaker cables (both excellent ones) although quite
a lot of time has gone since I listened to them. They all seemed to deliver
quite the same kind of righteous tonal cohesiveness, richness and fullness.
But, despite the excellence of the KS-3035, the Transparent Reference MM stays
alone at the top of my speaker cable hierarchy (Opus is very likely above it
but I have not tested it yet). Instead the second best group had a new participant,
the KS-3035. I was left wondering what KS-3038, the flag ship of Kimber Select
speaker cables, would have delivered.
KS-1016
against Reference MM
Is it fair to compare an under 920 euros cable to one eight times more expensive?
Actually it is not, but at least it will reveal what can be achieved with more
money, if so. Despite its relatively low price the KS-1016 delivered a great
amount of goodies like excellent resolution, open and clear upper register.
The sound was sharp but absolutely not strained although being more on the thin
than full side
The KS-1016 is unquestionably a very good cable but it could deliver only a
first step high-end performance. Transparent Reference MM interconnects showed
easily who is king of the hill and revealed what was missing here and there.
But that was not a surprise at all. Who was expecting another kind of result?
I must point out here that many of the audio systems, even relatively high quality
ones, will not benefit totally using the best cables just because they can not
handle information purely enough themselves. If the revealing information is
already lost elsewhere what can the top-notch cables do?
So, in certain kinds of audio systems the basic level high-end cables can do
at least almost the same job as higher quality ones. This is the first reason
for their existence. The second reason is system dependency and the third reason
is taste dependency, both well known issues which affects everywhere on audio
field. Because of these facts the KS-1016 and the other well engineered, built
and reasonably priced interconnects will always have their own place on audio
markets. Deservedly!
KS-1136 against Reference MM
In this case I was forced to do a slightly unbalanced comparison, just because
my monoblocks, Audionet AMP II Maxes, have single-ended construction and my
CD-player, Audio Aero Capitole Mk II SE, is not purely balanced (although not
purely single-ended either). Still they both offer balanced connectors as well.
This kind of equipment gives a tiny advantage to short RCA-interconnects (with
the same quality). Despite this unbalanced situation the KS-1136 did a wonderful
job and I had to work really hard to find remarkable sonic differences when
compared to my Transparent.
The sound that the KS-1136 delivered simply did not have any remarkable flaws.
Even the punch of bass, which actually was one of the clearest lacks of the
KS-1016, was full and dynamic. The most distinctive difference when compared
to my Transparent Reference MM interconnects was the KS-1136’s slight
tendency towards over-brightness. Actually we did (also) this notification independently
with my friend, and without knowing that the KS-1136 was a silver conductor
cable. I have tested numerous pure silver cables and almost everyone has some
kind of “treble boost” features. KS-1136 is a cable which has very
little of this kind of coloration and break in cohesiveness, but still does
a bit at least when set up into our systems. The reference cable was also slightly
ahead in reproduction of spatial and other kind of micro information.
Having said this I must praise the KS-1136’s over-all performance which
was nothing but equilibrium. It is a tremendous high-end interconnect which
challenges strongly even much more expensive cables. If I had fully balanced
equipment and I needed reasonably priced top quality interconnects the KS-1136
would be a serious candidate. Another one would be Siltech Forbes Lake, and
probably Tara Labs would be also included. Transparent Reference XL and MM interconnects
would be out because of their prices. So, the KS-1136’s performance was
just great. So good that my demanding friend also said “What a great cable
this was”!
Summary
The Kimber Select series offers extremely high quality. For example you can
not find poor materials or weak and thin spades. When looking at these cables
everything seems to be carefully done. This does at least inspire confidence
but can also set the groundwork for sonic improvements.
My well served Transparent Reference MM (MM tech) cables will stay as an important
part of my system. I have not met any cable which can outperform them. The sad
thing is that purchasing them was nothing but painful for my wallet. Well, the
Kimber Select series of cables are not cheap either, but there is a significant
difference if you pay 5.000 euros instead of 15.000 euros, isn’t there?
Once again it is important to point out how big the roles of system and taste
dependencies are. We can declare all kinds of listening results and cable hierarchies
but the system and taste dependencies may beat them all. So, the most important
thing for audiophiles is to choose the right cables for their system and for
their tastes. Naturally information can be read, it is even recommended, but
it can be used only as a basis for rough selection.
For the most serious audiophiles the quality of the sound is what really matters,
and in the case of the Kimber Select series it is very, very high. I will classify
KS-3035 and KS-1136 into my reference class, but not quite at the very top.
If the price, fit and finish of the cables are taken in account they are on
the top. Kimber Kables reputation as a top-notch cable producer is richly deserved.